1) they respected eu, uk and au norms and guaranteed safe harbour data held in respective countries, with no automatic US warrant action.
2) they reported product availability worldwide on equitable terms when they release in the US.
Until this starts happening, it feels like EU anti monopoly action is justified.
We'd be better of with Google de-amalgamated into a software and wholesale design and federated status across economy specific entities with no transfer pricing.
The size of e.g. EU and Indian federal and national and provincial and education/medicine is huge. Per bum on seat count, per user cost it would be significantly larger than the US Fed. Same when it comes to pixel features: announce US, 275m consumers. India, 175m active, 300m aspirational. Europe 440m consumers. "Oh Americans spend more" please.. do the arithmetic so do they spend that much more? No.
It's low hanging fruit. It's "visible to me here in mountain view" thinking.
I wish:
1) they respected eu, uk and au norms and guaranteed safe harbour data held in respective countries, with no automatic US warrant action.
2) they reported product availability worldwide on equitable terms when they release in the US.
Until this starts happening, it feels like EU anti monopoly action is justified.
We'd be better of with Google de-amalgamated into a software and wholesale design and federated status across economy specific entities with no transfer pricing.
The size of e.g. EU and Indian federal and national and provincial and education/medicine is huge. Per bum on seat count, per user cost it would be significantly larger than the US Fed. Same when it comes to pixel features: announce US, 275m consumers. India, 175m active, 300m aspirational. Europe 440m consumers. "Oh Americans spend more" please.. do the arithmetic so do they spend that much more? No.
It's low hanging fruit. It's "visible to me here in mountain view" thinking.